Sunday, March 25, 2012

The Science of Energy and Thought. Subconscious Mind Power

A scientific approach explaining the power of thought. We have all heard before, 'Your thoughts create your reality'. Well, new quantum physics studies support this idea.


Learn about recent research about how the mind can influence the behavior of subatomic particles and physical matter. If you enjoy the video, please pass it on to friends and family.

The power of our thoughts and feelings allows us to manifest our desires. The challenge is in harnessing our ever shifting perspectives so that we can focus upon the thoughts that can make a positive difference.

Working with our thoughts consciously allows our awareness and experience of life to unfold its potential. The key is to be open to change and express ourselves from a higher perspective on life.


Our past is but a memory and the future is in our imagination, right now in the present moment is our true point of power.

Dr. Joseph Murphy's book on the power of the Subconscious Mind is a practical guide to understand and learn to use the incredible powers you possess within you.


“By choosing your thoughts, and by selecting which emotional currents you will release and which you will reinforce, you determine the quality of your Light. You determine the effects that you will have upon others, and the nature of the experience of your life.” -Gary Zukav

Related Posts


20 comments:

  1. *****THE CIRCLE HAS A ONE PERCENT(+) FLATNESS FACTOR!!!*****
    [ https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=268979523217876&set=a.180539418728554.39062.179939338788562&type=1&permPage=1 ]

    QUANTUM PHYSICIST LEE SALEN-GA OF THE PHILIPPINES CREATED THE [ SALENGA QUANTUM TANGENT THEOREM ] WHICH IN TURN ALLOWED HIM TO CREATE THE SUBSTITUTE TO THE "SCHRODINGER CAT QUANTUM MECHANICAL PARADOX": CALLED; THE [ SALENGA GLOBALLY ROUND BUT LOCALLY FLAT EARTH ] QUANTUM MECHANICAL PARADOX.

    THE SALEN-GA QUANTUM TANGENT THEOREM: "THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF A STRAIGHT LINE TO A CIRCLE, ACQUIRES A QUANTUM TANGENT DIAMETER, EQUAL TO 1.11111(DOT TO DOT DISTANCE) OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE, DUE TO THE QUANTUM RELATIVITY OF SPACE-TIME.
    THIS MEANS THAT ALL SPHERES ARE LOCALLY COMPOSED OF MINI-FLAT FISH SCALE LIKE SURFACES, THE WAY GEODESIC DOMES ARE COMPOSED OF FLAT TRIANGLES!!![www.salengatangenttheorem.blogspot.com ]

    THE DISCOVERY HAVE BEEN CENSORED BY THE ILLUMINATI CONTROLLED MEDIA. PLEASE COPY/PASTE/POST WORLDWIDE.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That Kent Healy film was awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kent Healy's film has nothing whatever to do with quantum physics. It is the typical pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo used by the New Age movement. There are some true statements, and many that have no basis in scientific knowledge, but they have been cobbled together to support an unscientific explanation of reality.

    The truth is that quantum physics does NOT support the idea that 'Your thought create youir reality'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thank you for that information, to many things arnt what they say they are, im still gunna watch it but

      Delete
    2. You're a fool, Who are you to say what quantum phsyics does and soes not support. A plethora of quantum physicists are well aware of the effects of intention on subatomic particles. It all started back in 1927 at the 5th Solvay Conference on quantum mechanics in Brussels Belgium, when Hiesenburgh and Bohr approached Einstien with a new theory that the minds of the researchers were effecting the angular momentum of the electrons spin around the proton. You cannot jump to any conclusions without any proof to back it up. You're a fool. Get with reality.

      Delete
    3. Boom headshot owned.

      I'm with you Auro, as I have heard of similiar experiments where researchers suspected that their very presence nad act of observing affected the outcome of the experiments. And to the anonymous poster; How exactly would you know if it does have any connections to quantum physics? Do you even know what the extent of quantum physics is? No; Noone does. For you to claim a standard is ridiculous, as is your resilience against what the "New Age" movement might have to offer. You trying to encapsule the movement into a single box instead of what it truly is ( A plethora, lurkmoar) is you just trying to define what you don't understand.

      Delete
    4. Talking about quantum physics and not having clear a meaning of word like resilience? Didn´t you mean resistance?
      Beware of pseudo-science. It has caused a lot of pain during the course of history.
      It all sounds really nice... but... are this theories supported by scientific facts?

      Delete
    5. I am with you Anonymous. This stuff is complete claptrap and is found everywhere on the web. It is amazing how easy it is to twist difficult concepts around to fool the minds of the unprepared.

      Delete
  4. After watching and understanding latest evidence, hop on over to my channel and watch ACAPL Theory. the beginning of my video describes scientifically how our minds are able to register physical affects on the subatomic realm. After I explain how this works, I dive into different subtle energies and their physical effects as well. A plethora of quantum physicists and I are more than conviced we have much more potential and that we are able to produce a subtle energy far more powerful than ever.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Where can a "beginner" learn more about this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Goodness... Dr. Amit Goswami is great... check out What the bleep do we know and then anything that comes your way, take it all in and the dots will start connecting.

      Delete
  6. 'What the Bleep do we know', is a great documentary to watch. I also strongly suggest reading David Wilcock's 'The Source Field Investigations'.
    Happy travels :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Main problem with these statements is that it is based on the assumption that 'molecules change from a chaotic to a fixed position when observed'. This is true but the word 'observed' is misleading. It doesn't mean that we observe them but in fact observing them with instruments changes their behavior. We can't measure particles without some kind of interference. However, nothing happens when humans individually look at molecules. Invalid assumption leads to bad conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." -
    Albert Einstein

    "If you don't understand it well enough, don't try to explain it." - Anonamoose

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is not the presence of people that 'collapses the wave function'. It is the act of measurement. Most of this film is scientifically wrong. It is the usual New Age practice of using scientific terminology , that they don't understand, to bolster their airy-fairy, pink candyfloss nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Science can prove only so much. There is powers locked in the human mind that we have not the keys to unlock. Just as we adults withhold certain keys from our children for good reasons , certain keys are held from us untill the appointed time. The human "error factor" is a withholder also. Since scientific research discredits (and/or refuses to accept ) certain things it cannot prove ,much knowledge will remain unknown indefinitely

    ReplyDelete
  11. there is much gretaer explaination and practical expperiences, being given at ONENESS UNIVERCITY, INDIA... thats an awsome place to learn from. check that out friends.. ONENESS UNIVERSITY. whole world is towards it today...

    ReplyDelete
  12. “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.” - Albert Einstein.
    This was one of the most important 'mind-sets' to Albert Einstein and he strongly emphasised it through out his life. Strange how some who study his theories and general science alike are completely oblivious to it.

    ReplyDelete